Good Debate

A while ago I found a debate series called Intelligence Squared that I find quite enjoyable. They have audio and video archives of all their past debates which cover a range of topics. It's interesting to see how the skill of the debater is usually painfully obvious. Sometimes they are even making a good point but their delivery is so awful that it nullifies any merit their argument might have had.  They have the audience vote for or against the motion (or undecided) before and after the debate and the winner is the side that has the largest positive pre/post movement

Major Reductions in Carbon Emissions are Not Worth the Money


This is an older debate that I watched this week while taping up a stack of textbooks.  It might be my favorite of those that I've watched.  The debaters were all pretty good, and a couple of them were British which is always more entertaining for some reason.  I think it also had the largest opinion swing that I've seen.  Click on the results tab here if you don't have two hours to watch the debate.

Comments

Ryan said…
I have watched one of these before. This one:

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/558-clean-energy-can-drive-americas-economic-recovery


I'll tell you my problem with these. It looks like lots of them set a businessman, politico or politician type against an academic type. I suppose some politicians have more name recognition, but academic types almost always do better at these kind of debates. In the one I watched, the "for" side simply had no chance against Steven Hayward.

I watched a documentary about Bjorn Lomborg recently, where he picks apart all the false claims in An Inconvenient Truth. I liked, it until the end where he proposed we spend as much money as we would spend to meet the Kyoto protocol, just on his other statist ambitions.
Ryan said…
If the winner was who got the biggest swing, the "for" side should have won that debate, but it didn't.
Brett said…
The "for" side did win.
Brett said…
Scanning the handful of these I have seen, the academics do tend to do very well, but not always. And I'm guessing that they're scrambling at times to find panelists and end up going with whoever will agree to come.
Ryan said…
That's not what this thing says:

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/607-major-reductions-in-carbon-emissions-are-not-worth-the-money

DECLARED WINNER: AGAINST THE MOTION

Ryan said…
you have to click on "see results"
Brett said…
That's weird. It's an error. If you watch the video (from 1:48:30) they announce the for side as the winner.
Ryan said…
Who ever is doing the graphics needs to learn the rules for wining and losing. Here is another wrong one.

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/past-debates/item/598-guns-reduce-crime

Ryan said…
I'm only 45 minutes into this debate, but there is a major disconnect between what all but the first "against" guy argued and what the "for" side is arguing. The for side is arguing against government imposed Kyoto type reductions in carbon. the Defense is arguing for internal corporate cost-cutting and carbon reducing measures. No one is saying, companies should run their computers 24 hours a day, even if they only use them 8 hours. Only the first guy really tried to defend Kyoto-like regulations.

Popular posts from this blog

2019 Stats - Solar

Two Speeches

Books (2022 and 2023)